Simplify the testing of related people targeting

[emyoulation]

@bszabi05

English is not my native language, and I fell into a translation trap. I will immediately update the plugin and the GitHub repository to correct this terminology.

@Nick-Hall and @dsblank validating what Persons are returned for a chart can be difficult even when working in one’s native tongue.

Can you suggest a validation code snippet for designers of new charts (or builders of Custom Filters for a chart) might use?

I am thinking of a temporary override for a Name Display format or Birth/Death fallback that inserts the box’s Relationship calculation to the Active/Center/Focal person of the chart/report.

Such a tool/option might make proofreading a report/chart much quicker and offer greater confidence.

[emyoulation]

I have a “Pseudonym” example tree that is useful for validating some of my filtering.

The relationship to the home person is exposed in the testing of a Custom Filter, Report, Export or Chart. You don’t have to remember if Aunt Mary was the biological relative or married in. Nor if she was a paternal or maternal aunt.)

However the cloud of possible relationships is not fully populated. Cousins, Siblings, In-laws, Piblings, Niblings are types of missing people that would be helpful for testing.