rajan
May 22, 2024, 3:14pm
1
Gramps 5.2.2
Gramps Web API 2.3.1
Gramps Web Frontend 24.5.0
Gramps QL 0.3.0
locale: en
multi-tree: true
task queue: true
I have problems with sync.
After a sync there is a message ‘Sucessfully synchronized 4 objects’.
But when I issue a new sync the same objects pop up …
I have not encountered that before.
Can you please try running check & repair on both sides? If that doesn’t help, it would be interesting looking at the XMLs exported from both sides and see if those objects differ.
Please archive appropriately named backups prior to check & repair.
That way, there will be information that can be recovered about the underlying cause.
rajan
May 23, 2024, 9:44am
4
I made a check & repair on both sides and no errors were found.
After that I made a new sync but still the same objects turned up.
What is the next step?
It would be interesting looking at the XMLs exported from both sides and see if those objects differ.
rajan
May 23, 2024, 12:14pm
7
I have compared the XML files (local & remote) for the entries.
If more actions from mee please let me know …
[LOCAL]
</event>
<event handle="_f4397b81c9914e42d691742607f" change="1716213088" id="E1704">
<type>Death</type>
<dateval val="1958-11-20"/>
</event>
<event handle="_f930322da195b9830f57c2df0ec" change="1712409033" id="E2095">
<type>Birth</type>
<dateval val="1827-05-07"/>
<description>Hara</description>
</event>
<event handle="_f9bacfb18de35277a821257c554" change="1716129664" id="E2386">
<type>Burial</type>
<dateval val="1846-05-15"/>
</object>
<object handle="_f9b4492c9597022cbf928a0bb9e" change="1715954481" id="O0879">
<file src="Toomas Helsingfors _Vilivalla_1.jpg" mime="image/jpeg" checksum="5ecd2e591965e42fc1ce2657a2f277b7" description="Toomas Helsingfors _Vilivalla_1"/>
[REMOTE]
</event>
<event handle="_f4397b81c9914e42d691742607f" change="1716464730" id="E1704">
<type>Death</type>
<dateval val="1958-11-20"/>
</event>
<event handle="_f930322da195b9830f57c2df0ec" change="1716464730" id="E2095">
<type>Birth</type>
<dateval val="1827-05-07"/>
<description>Hara</description>
</event>
<event handle="_f9bacfb18de35277a821257c554" change="1716464730" id="E2386">
<type>Burial</type>
<dateval val="1846-05-15"/>
</object>
<object handle="_f9b4492c9597022cbf928a0bb9e" change="1716464730" id="O0879">
<file src="Toomas Helsingfors _Vilivalla_1.jpg" mime="image/jpeg" checksum="5ecd2e591965e42fc1ce2657a2f277b7" description="Toomas Helsingfors _Vilivalla_1"/>
Hard to see, are they the same?
rajan
May 23, 2024, 12:50pm
9
Yes they are … they have same ‘event handle & ID’ in both local & remote.
Only thing that differs is change=xxx"
rajan
May 28, 2024, 4:22pm
10
I added some more peolple to the tree and after a sync the old ones are still there and another event joined the list.
Now I have:
E1704
E2095
E2386
E2456 (new)
O0879
What do you recommend.
Have an idea … if the persons related to the event & places are deleted in the remote database and a new sync will be done … the sync should be correct or …