It has similar functionality to the old gramplet. Hovering over a bar highlights it. Double clicking on a bar shows a quick report of the people within the selected range.
I have added an orange bar for values exceeding the maximum range set in the configuration. The chart also automatically resizes.
Any comments and suggestions are welcome.
Perhaps we should separate the charts into separate gramplets? Would some pie charts be useful?
This looks really great… No need to split the different charts, other than if its possible to print them, then i be a feature to have one chart on one page, or one chart printed to one image file… May be easier to usee in different presentation maybe, if they are separate…?
Wow! that’s a big improvement on the old text based chart!
One immediate thought… Could you break out separate “0” & “<1” rows? The Stillborn & Infant Mortality are typically stats that interest people.
Any chance you might create a re-usable routine to add QuickReport pop-up menu item to export the selected data to the body of a new ‘ToDo’ Note? …one where the export that preserves the hotlinks? If the current ‘copy’ clipboarded links in addition to plain text, it would provide a similar functionality. I know I’d love to be able whip up a pre-linked Note from the Pedigree or Deep Connections gramplet!
It wouldn’t have to save immediately… but that data opened in the Note Editor would make a nice working list that could be trimmed before saving.
Thanks for this useful addon. Unfortunately, in my version 5.1.5 the statistics are still output as text but with special characters. How could one correct the statistic display?
You are still using the the original built-in or the manually patched version referenced above?
Your screen capture looks like a font mismatch. The original uses text to represent the bars. I’m not sure how the manually installed version draws those graphical bars.
I use the original addon with the following update URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/gramps-project/addons/master/gramps51
I also think it’s a font issue, because when copying and pasting the text into a text editor, the characters suddenly become visible in a human-readable way.
Can the Age Stats data be affected by the Filter Gramplet or a Custom Filter?
It is more likely that Age Stats would be useful on a specific branch of population subset than on the undifferentiated population of the entire tree. For instance, Age Stats on a person’s ancestors (and possibly, their sibs) would be a useful predictive demographic.
What is the proper way to frame a Feature Request to make the Dashboard have a tree filter?
Filters would make large Tree statistics and visualizations much more actionable if the data could be limited to a single branch of Ascendants and/or Descendants. Or when comparing and contrasting those of 2 persons.
An inquiry about filtered statistics was posted to the Gramps Geneanet forum. That’s what prompted reviving this thread.
Just open a feature request describing what type of filters you want and how the user should select them.
We could create a new view to experiment with the feature. I’m not sure if we would be able to use existing gramplets, or if we would need to create a new gramplet type. Perhaps the view could gather statistics that could be shared between multiple gramplets.
One suggestion for this gramplet, when you dobule click an bar to show what people is in that statistic like this:
Wouldnt it be better if the person editor is opened if you double click the person, rather than having to right click and pressing See person details? Or is an reason why that isnt the case other than its not implemented?
Bonus:
Why is that “Filter matched 1 record” text a serif font when everything else is sans-serif?
(Font in settings is set to sans-serif)
Then change what I said to be aimed at the quick view/filter instead of this gramplet then.
I havent found any other place in Gramps where there is Serif font personally (Other than the Graph View no font selected thing in 5.2 but probably different thing)
I assume the gramplet does not produce any stats for people in the db (or, when it gets implemented, tree) who do not have sufficient data to compute their age?
I think it would be useful to have at least the option of including the number and % of people who are in the db (or tree) but with insufficient data.
