Gramplet and now

gramps 6.07 linux mint 22.3

Hello, I have individuals marked as “incomplete individual” or “incomplete family” even though all fields are filled (descriptions, dates, places, sources…). Is there an explanation for this?

Hello.

Does this seem related to spouses (in-laws) or the children of a couple?

What I see is that a “Complete” label (whose name is configurable) is missing on the individual or family. The code seems to indicate that this can be disabled, but I am not using this gramplet.

I tried to reproduce it but was unable to obtain these results. Indeed, there is this issue of “tag”, except that in theory, by default, the “Complete” label does not really exist. A residue of an old feature (built-in todo and complete tags)?

@michel, can you perhaps shed some light on the presence (or absence) of tags on these individuals and families?

By adding the full tag to families and individuals, the incomplete mention disappears.

Ah, ok, it was in lowercase…
Nevertheless, where does this tag search come from? With a new database (a new tree without tags), this gramplet gives me no indication regarding records without the ‘complete’ tag.

Exporting and importing into a new database—can that work?

Done, I removed the tags; now I have this gramplet that works.

When importing the example.gramps database, there is indeed a complete tag in English.

But especially in gen.lib.markertype.

This is indeed an old feature!

> From version 3.3 onwards, this is only kept to convert markers into tags
> when loading old database files.