Been playing with this again and wondered could it be extended to include Recent Tags
This would save me an awful lot of mouse clicks
phil
Been playing with this again and wondered could it be extended to include Recent Tags
This would save me an awful lot of mouse clicks
phil
tagging @kku since Recent-Items is his creation.
Good idea. I will investigate.
Talking about the “recent” sub-menu, I think there is a difference in how different types of objects are treated.
Whereas new places and events are immediately added to the recent list when created, new media items are only added once they have been reused. Also the number of items on the media list appears to be smaller than on the other lists.
I hope this could be included when working on the code.
Are you conflating the Recent Items addon with the built-in “history” accessed with the < back> forward toolbar buttons and Go menu features?
Because yes, those omit “New” items unless they are selected or attached as a secondary object as part of the creation process. Which can be awkward.
Here is what I find:
By the way, I didn’t mention before that I use Gramps 5.2.3 on Ubuntu 24.04
It seemed best to make this a separate addon, not trying to add tag handling in the ‘Recent Items’ addon.
I decided to try AI to generate this addon. The code produced by Claude AI (after several iterations) is here:
I was surprised that the free version of Claude was so useful.
This also includes a preferences tool (Tools > Utilities > Recent Tags Preferences) that allows the user to specify the maximum number of recent tags saved per database.
Let me know if this works for you.
Thanks
Incredible I will have to try Claude myself.
Just to let you know
Yes it works if you Edit a Person or Event and select Tag, have tried
and that is good.
It does not work if you are in Person View or Event View and Select the
Tag Icon from the Toolbar or in GraphView right click on an individual
select Tag.
This seems to be a problem not just with Tags different developers
different methods of achieving the same thing but not necessarily
compatible. This is not a criticism just a fact of life with GRAMPS
Please do not worry any further I will try for a while to see what
happens and get back to you
phil