There are already “more than 2 contributor” IVF cases that are difficult to record: the cases where the sperm donor, egg donor or gestational surrogate are from outside an intended parent couple.
This is another modern complication that our very traditional Gramps doesn’t consider.
I’d probably record it the same way as @SNoiraud suggested.
It depends on the mitochondrial donor. If they are (closely) related, but without the mutation causing the disease, it might not matter to record a seperate ancestral line.
Cool! Your suggestion made complete sense about setting up the extra Family and using a a Custom “IVF” relationship type within Gramps.
But I didn’t recognize the graphstyle – with the color boxes & solid/dashed lines that show more than primary pedigree. (I haven’t experimented nearly enough with reports in Gramps!) Naturally, you can tweak the diagram layout & colors in GraphViz but how did you get the essential information in there to start?
Can you describe the workflow that gets the basic data into GraphViz? Were you using a GEDCOM export? Or a particular graphical report with some sort of “blended family” person filter?
Or the maybe the Graph View print with the All Connected?
Difficult to say, since it’s highly unlikely to occur within my tree in my lifetime. I currently have mtDNA information for only three people and haven’t done much with it, other than to store the haplotype as an attribute. In this case the child might have a different haplotype, and an explanatory note could be added to the attribute. I don’t know what value there would be (to me) in storing the ancestry of the donor, assuming the donor isn’t anonymous.