GEDCOM import shortcomings - no documentation?

[emyoulation]

In the “see also” section of that page, there is a very exacting assessment of Gramps’ quality and shortfalls with standard 5.5.1 GEDCOM imports:

• Cardinal, John. “GEDCOM Assessment v1.05” evaluating GEDCOM v5.5.1 import using Gramps AIO64-5.1.2-1 with the " assess.ged v1.05" test file, 7 Mar 2020 (GEDCOM Assessment change log)

There’s also a thread about other 3rd party reviews of the Gramps GEDCOM implementation:

3rd party reviews of Gramps GEDCOM import

Was looking for something else but found a tag-by-tag assessment of Gramps’ GEDCOM 5.5.1 import. Thought I’d post it (and a couple previous ones) here for future reference. In GEDasssement dot com’s summary, counts ranged from tools correctly handling 121 tags to 229 tags. Gramps was 4th at 187 tags handled “correctly” by their standards. Cardinal, John. “GEDCOM Assessment v1.05” evaluating GEDCOM v5.5.1 import using Gramps AIO64-5.1.2-1 with the " assess.ged v1.05" test file, 7 Mar 2020 Rig…