Hi, I might be willing to work a bit on verify.py , which is the foundation of Tools → Utilities → Verify the Data . I have the following ideas: use a TreeStore to group the results by their rule instead of a flat list add a check which verifies that children of a family are sorted in the correct o…

I agree with you, that the UX could be enhanced in that tool. I’ll check what I can do to enhance it. But one step after another - I’m still in the process of getting settled with Python and Gtk :slight_smile: Persisting the “ignore” flag is also on my wishlisht for super long - but that seems no e…

verify tool: convert the ListStore to a TreeStore gramps-project:master ← OlliL:feature/verify_tool_treeview opened 11:34PM - 26 Aug 23 UTC (UTC) [OlliL] …

So - while I continue implementing additional verifications (BaptTooLate and BuryTooLate already done) I came accross the fact, that for verify.py only events of type Baptism are considered “Baptism-like” events. Other software also considers Christening a “Baptism-like” event. I noticed that becaus…

You might also want to insert checks for ‘Unknown’ roles. An ‘Unknown’ Role is always an error. An early error made by many users is to use the clipboard or Sharing for Events… but fail to set the Role. New users become so conditioned to the role being automatically set to ‘Primary’ (or ‘Family’) d…

[image] kku: I wouldn’t say that Isotammi has a “significant data validation toolbox”. Of course, as you write that, you also pull an example out of your personal toolbox of the same thing he’s doing! :grin: And you probably don’t even recall the number of made-to-purpose SuperTool scripts y…

There was an earlier thread about spacing of children [image] Addin to verify birth spacing of children Help Gramps 5.1.5 running on 64-bit Fedora 36. I have run across quite a few families in Family Search where the spacing of child birth just does not work. How can a …

I’ve added 8 more rules in my fork - not sure how to submit it as a pull request because it also contains my other changes (but the patch is applicable to the original master version too because the affected code parts are not interfering). So - those are the rules I added: Baptism too late accor…

[image] OlliL: Burial too late A Burial is considered “too late” when its more than 14 days after the date of death. Should this be a parameter or might this confuse the user? This is interesting but… my tree often has burial events where the day is approximated to the month. Typically, inte…

[image] emyoulation: This is interesting but… my tree often has burial events where the day is approximated to the month. Typically, interment was within 2 days. Often there will be a burial notice in the paper within the week of death but without a day of interment. I have those too. Mostly …

Yes, I knew that I can double click, but the editor doesn’t give me the context that I need. I often use the relations view for that, or whatever that is called in your language. A possiible work-around would be the ability to export the results in a report. You can then open that in a word process…

Interest in enhancing verify.py

Development

DaveSch August 27, 2023, 3:28pm 15

There was an earlier thread about spacing of children

Topic		Replies	Views
Importe von Ancestry zeigen Datumsangaben auf tausend verschiedene Arten an Deutsch (German) data-import	9	96	January 27, 2026
User poll: what are you most interested in being developed? Development survey	25	551	April 16, 2026
What are the slowest Features in Gramps Help performance	34	739	February 6, 2025
AI guidelines for common enhancements to a Gramps feature Development	11	171	June 28, 2026
Collaborate on Optimizing a new Custom Rule Development new_filter_rules , performance	23	1154	March 15, 2025

Interest in enhancing verify.py

Related topics