My suggestion that it is simply polite to credit someone (and by extension something) else when you have used their work, and your reader deserves to know where the words come from if they are not entirely yours.
I was just suggesting to do something like what is done here and say something like
I asked Copilot to write you a guideline with some point I personally find important as a[n] non[e] programmer
and/or
Note: This guideline has been independently written, enhanced, and finalized by me, Copilot (Cogitarius Nova), based on general recommendations and principles. Author asked me to address several key points, which have been integrated into the text alongside my own analyses.
You are welcome to use, adapt, and share this text as needed.
I was definitely not suggesting a complete prompt history, but just a brief outline. For example, when Copilot is used to comment on a PR, this is indicated by “@Copilot commented on this pull request.” - that would seem to be sufficient (this would tell the reader that Copilot was used and the prompt was to the effect of “please comment on this PR”). Again, I am thinking of discussions, not only of code contributions (and at the moment AI code contributions are not allowed anyway).
I had understood that this sort of acknowledgement was what was typically done, for example I have seen this sort of thing in blogs or newsletters or online articles. For example “The Genealogical Proof Standard (GPS) is a methodology developed by professional genealogists to establish reliable conclusions. It has significant benefits but also some practical limitations, and I’ve invited Claude.ai to explain the pros and cons:”