# New Relationship Status/Event type: Separated **URL:** \ **Category:** Ideas\ **Created:** [May 1, 2026, 11:50pm UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/new-relationship-status-event-type-separated/9439 "2026-05-01T23:50:04Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 25
**Author:** ![emyoulation](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/gramps.discourse.group/emyoulation/32/67_2.png) [@emyoulation](https://gramps.discourse.group/u/emyoulation)\ **Post date:** [July 7, 2026, 12:44pm UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/new-relationship-status-event-type-separated/9439/25 "2026-07-07T12:44:28Z")
12 posts were split to a new topic: [YAML custom types revisited](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/yaml-custom-types-revisited/9691) Split per request of OP. Topic title is arbitrary and open to renaming. (Or, since the digression was introduced as being a continuation of an idea posted elsewhere, it will be integrated into that thread when found.) > [@YAML custom types revisited](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/yaml-custom-types-revisited/9691/9): > > think my question got lost in this translation discussion; have betrothals been considered for addition (to represent arranged unions not by the marital pair, in comparison to an engagement, which is by the pair), or are they going to be folded into engaged/be a custom type per user needs? --- _[View the full topic](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/new-relationship-status-event-type-separated/9439)._