# Is there someone you could Actively Recruit to the Gramps project?

**URL:** <https://gramps.discourse.group/t/is-there-someone-you-could-actively-recruit-to-the-gramps-project/2496>\
**Category:** Help\
**Created:** [June 10, 2022, 2:40pm UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/is-there-someone-you-could-actively-recruit-to-the-gramps-project/2496 "2022-06-10T14:40:22Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 4

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![ennoborg](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/gramps.discourse.group/ennoborg/32/4659_2.png) [@ennoborg](https://gramps.discourse.group/u/ennoborg)\
**Post date:** [June 11, 2022, 2:31pm UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/is-there-someone-you-could-actively-recruit-to-the-gramps-project/2496/4 "2022-06-11T14:31:27Z")

</div>

I mean this one, which derailed a bit …

> [@Update Sources and citations](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/update-sources-and-citations/1497):
>
> I would love to see Gramps sources and citations be enhanced to something similar to what is used in Family Historian 7 or Rootsmagic. What is used now looks like what was used with PAF before it was discontinued.

Another was about JSON, but when I can have a choice, I prefer to go full SQL.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/is-there-someone-you-could-actively-recruit-to-the-gramps-project/2496)._