# Interest in enhancing verify.py

**URL:** https://gramps.discourse.group/t/interest-in-enhancing-verify-py/4075
**Category:** Development
**Created:** [August 26, 2023, 12:33pm UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/interest-in-enhancing-verify-py/4075 "2023-08-26T12:33:11Z")
**Posts on this page:** 1
**Showing post:** 8

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![kku](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/k/6bbea6/32.png) [@kku](https://gramps.discourse.group/u/kku)
#### Post date: [August 26, 2023, 4:40pm UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/interest-in-enhancing-verify-py/4075/8 "2023-08-26T16:40:47Z")

</div>

Funny, I also had the idea of using a Treeview - my experimental version looks basically identical to yours:

 ![image.png](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/gramps/original/2X/b/b2606ec68ab80affb11a97b49b5e8e91d2dce247.png)

I wouldn’t say that Isotammi has a “significant data validation toolbox”. We built some tools to fix problematic GEDCOM files and some tools to help in mass editing data in Gramps - but those don’t help much in validating data!

la 26. elok. 2023 klo 17.44 Brian McCullough via The Gramps Project (Discourse Forum & Mailing List) ([notifications@gramps.discoursemail.com](mailto:notifications@gramps.discoursemail.com)) kirjoitti:

---

_[View the full topic](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/interest-in-enhancing-verify-py/4075)._