# Graphview et tags

**URL:** <https://gramps.discourse.group/t/graphview-et-tags/8018>\
**Category:** Ideas\
**Created:** [July 30, 2025, 6:43am UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/graphview-et-tags/8018 "2025-07-30T06:43:16Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![bjc49](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/gramps.discourse.group/bjc49/32/316_2.png) [@bjc49](https://gramps.discourse.group/u/bjc49)\
**Post date:** [August 4, 2025, 5:57am UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/graphview-et-tags/8018/3 "2025-08-04T05:57:37Z")

</div>

I’m wondering if I’m in the right place to express these feature requests? First, why am I fixated on these two views?[Interface graphique (GraphView)](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/interface-graphique-graphview/6977/1)

As a member of a small genealogy knowledge exchange group, I’m trying to direct people to the Gramps software. In my opinion, Graphview and its rich context menus allow you to build your family tree interactively without necessarily using the browser.

In my opinion, it’s only afterward that I emphasize the importance of citing your sources, thus explaining the data structure.For me, the Combined/Events view gives a one-click overview of everything you’ve built.

And recently, while rereading [Je change de logiciel : mon organisation](https://la-gazette-des-ancetres.fr/je-change-de-logiciel-mon-organisation/) Even though we’re talking about another genealogy software, I looked into the use of tags, and that’s the purpose of my remarks.

---

_[View the full topic](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/graphview-et-tags/8018)._