# Gramplet and now

**URL:** <https://gramps.discourse.group/t/gramplet-et-maintenant/9264>\
**Category:** Français (French)\
**Created:** [March 25, 2026, 9:55pm UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/gramplet-et-maintenant/9264 "2026-03-25T21:55:44Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 8\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![michel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ea666f/32.png) [@michel](https://gramps.discourse.group/u/michel)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2026, 9:55pm UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/gramplet-et-maintenant/9264/1 "2026-03-25T21:55:44Z")

</div>

gramps 6.07 linux mint 22.3

Hello, I have individuals marked as “incomplete individual” or “incomplete family” even though all fields are filled (descriptions, dates, places, sources…). Is there an explanation for this?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![romjerome](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/gramps.discourse.group/romjerome/32/1489_2.png) [@romjerome](https://gramps.discourse.group/u/romjerome)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2026, 11:26pm UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/gramplet-et-maintenant/9264/2 "2026-03-25T23:26:18Z")

</div>

Hello.

> <https://github.com/gramps-project/gramps/blob/master/gramps/plugins/gramplet/whatsnext.py#L388>

> <https://github.com/gramps-project/gramps/blob/master/gramps/plugins/gramplet/whatsnext.py#L469>

Does this seem related to spouses (in-laws) or the children of a couple?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![roptat](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/r/51bf81/32.png) [@roptat](https://gramps.discourse.group/u/roptat)\
**Post date:** [March 26, 2026, 8:10am UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/gramplet-et-maintenant/9264/3 "2026-03-26T08:10:34Z")

</div>

What I see is that a “Complete” label (whose name is configurable) is missing on the individual or family. The code seems to indicate that this can be disabled, but I am not using this gramplet.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![romjerome](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/gramps.discourse.group/romjerome/32/1489_2.png) [@romjerome](https://gramps.discourse.group/u/romjerome)\
**Post date:** [March 26, 2026, 9:08am UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/gramplet-et-maintenant/9264/4 "2026-03-26T09:08:09Z")

</div>

I tried to reproduce it but was unable to obtain these results. Indeed, there is this issue of “tag”, except that in theory, by default, the “Complete” label does not really exist. A residue of an old feature (built-in `todo` and `complete` tags)?

@michel, can you perhaps shed some light on the presence (or absence) of tags on these individuals and families?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![michel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ea666f/32.png) [@michel](https://gramps.discourse.group/u/michel)\
**Post date:** [March 26, 2026, 9:31am UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/gramplet-et-maintenant/9264/5 "2026-03-26T09:31:27Z")

</div>

By adding the full tag to families and individuals, the incomplete mention disappears.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![romjerome](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/gramps.discourse.group/romjerome/32/1489_2.png) [@romjerome](https://gramps.discourse.group/u/romjerome)\
**Post date:** [March 26, 2026, 6:50pm UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/gramplet-et-maintenant/9264/6 "2026-03-26T18:50:16Z")

</div>

Ah, ok, it was in lowercase…  
Nevertheless, where does this tag search come from? With a new database (a new tree without tags), this gramplet gives me no indication regarding records without the ‘complete’ tag.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![michel](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/m/ea666f/32.png) [@michel](https://gramps.discourse.group/u/michel)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2026, 11:17am UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/gramplet-et-maintenant/9264/7 "2026-03-27T11:17:41Z")

</div>

Exporting and importing into a new database—can that work?

Done, I removed the tags; now I have this gramplet that works.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![romjerome](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/gramps.discourse.group/romjerome/32/1489_2.png) [@romjerome](https://gramps.discourse.group/u/romjerome)\
**Post date:** [March 27, 2026, 7:07pm UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/gramplet-et-maintenant/9264/8 "2026-03-27T19:07:59Z")

</div>

> [@michel](#):
>
> Will exporting and importing into a new database work?

When importing the `example.gramps` database, there is indeed a `complete` tag in English.

> <https://github.com/gramps-project/gramps/blob/master/example/gramps/example.gramps#L15>

But especially in `gen.lib.markertype`.

> <https://github.com/gramps-project/gramps/blob/master/gramps/gen/lib/markertype.py#L59>

This is indeed an old feature!

_\> From version 3.3 onwards, this is only kept to convert markers into tags_  
_\> when loading old database files._