# Beta1 "Types" - Linked for Feedback

**URL:** <https://gramps.discourse.group/t/beta1-types-linked-for-feedback/3926>\
**Category:** Beta Testing\
**Tags:** feedback\
**Created:** [August 2, 2023, 3:31pm UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/beta1-types-linked-for-feedback/3926 "2023-08-02T15:31:56Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![emyoulation](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/gramps.discourse.group/emyoulation/32/67_2.png) [@emyoulation](https://gramps.discourse.group/u/emyoulation)\
**Post date:** [August 2, 2023, 3:31pm UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/beta1-types-linked-for-feedback/3926/1 "2023-08-02T15:31:56Z")

</div>

Continuing the discussion from [Gramps v5.2.0-beta1 released](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/gramps-v5-2-0-beta1-released/3903):

> [@Gramps v5.2.0-beta1 released](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/gramps-v5-2-0-beta1-released/3903/1):
>
> **Types**
> 
> - Add new note type of “Analysis”. PR#[4174](https://github.com/gramps-project/gramps/pull/1474)
> - Add Stillbirth as pre-defined event type. Add Stillbirth as a fallback for both Birth and Death events. PR#[1148](https://github.com/gramps-project/gramps/pull/1148)
> - Change “death cause” to “cause of death”. PR#[234](https://github.com/gramps-project/gramps/pull/234) GEDCOM compatibility
> - [Add Godparent as event role](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/godparent-promoted-to-a-standard-role-for-5-2/4560/2). PR#[1054](https://github.com/gramps-project/gramps/pull/1054)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![emyoulation](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/gramps.discourse.group/emyoulation/32/67_2.png) [@emyoulation](https://gramps.discourse.group/u/emyoulation)\
**Post date:** [December 23, 2023, 8:22pm UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/beta1-types-linked-for-feedback/3926/2 "2023-12-23T20:22:13Z")

</div>

“Godparent promoted to a standard role for 5.2”

The example.gramps has [2 Godfather examples as Associations](https://gramps-project.org/bugs/view.php?id=13112).

While it is a minor that that will have to be revised for the 5.2 examples, many users are going to have examples of Godparent, Godfather, Godmother, Godchild, Godson and Goddaughter. And those will need to be harmonized into the Reference information section (which adds Citations in 5.2) of the Christening Events.  
 ![image](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/free1/uploads/gramps/original/2X/8/8a045d1bf276290f5f8541425dd9a47fa3b8f232.png)

In addition to the value itself, the Association may have Citations, Notes, Privacy and a modification date that would be useful to preserve in the Shared Event.

This is a likely evolution path of popular Associations in the future too. So a batch tool that migrates an Association (merges a particular association type into a new share from the Association person’s Primary-Role Events) is likely to be needed in the future.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![emyoulation](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/gramps.discourse.group/emyoulation/32/67_2.png) [@emyoulation](https://gramps.discourse.group/u/emyoulation)\
**Post date:** [December 25, 2023, 8:16pm UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/beta1-types-linked-for-feedback/3926/3 "2023-12-25T20:16:58Z")

</div>

Updated:

- “[How do I…](https://gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php/Category:How_do_I...)” category’s [Add a Godfather-Godmother](https://gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php/Add_a_godfather-godmother) article.
- in Glossary
  - [Event role](https://gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php/Gramps_Glossary#event_role)
  - [godparent](https://gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php/Gramps_Glossary#godparent)

Unresolved:

- A [known issue](https://www.gramps-project.org/wiki/index.php/Import_from_another_genealogy_program#Known_issues_3) in the 2007 [tmg2gramps](http://www.cohsoft.com.au/tmg2gramps/) Perl convertor

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![emyoulation](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/gramps.discourse.group/emyoulation/32/67_2.png) [@emyoulation](https://gramps.discourse.group/u/emyoulation)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2025, 6:16am UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/beta1-types-linked-for-feedback/3926/4 "2025-02-02T06:16:57Z")

</div>

> [@Gramps v5.2.0-beta1 released](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/gramps-v5-2-0-beta1-released/3903/1):
>
> Add Stillbirth as pre-defined event type. Add Stillbirth as a fallback for both Birth and Death events. PR#[1148](https://github.com/gramps-project/gramps/pull/1148)

Just used Stillbirth for the 1st time.

After adding the Stillbirth event, I clicked Add again to add the burial. But Gramps guessed “Birth”. It should have recognized Stillbirth as both a Birth and a Death then skipped to guess Burial.

Is that change to the Guessing sequence a Bug or an Enhancement?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![DaveSch](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/gramps.discourse.group/davesch/32/40_2.png) [@DaveSch](https://gramps.discourse.group/u/DaveSch)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2025, 6:40am UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/beta1-types-linked-for-feedback/3926/5 "2025-02-02T06:40:22Z")

</div>

It behaves just like if you add a baptism as the first event. Add a second event and birth will default when you probably wanted death. The guessing only follows birth, death, then burial even when other events are the fallback events. If all three are used, birth will be the default for other new events.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![comeng](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/c/2acd7d/32.png) [@comeng](https://gramps.discourse.group/u/comeng)\
**Post date:** [February 2, 2025, 6:49am UTC](https://gramps.discourse.group/t/beta1-types-linked-for-feedback/3926/6 "2025-02-02T06:49:45Z")

</div>

In the same vein why when I do a “birth” and then “next event” does it  
skip to “death” my logic is always to look for a baptism (sometimes the  
baptism is found first).  
Can I alter this?  
Can it be configurable?  
phil
